.
Earlier this week the BBC contacted my friend Nick Kollerstrom asking him if he would be prepared to participate in BBC1's Sunday flagship forum for debates on 'ethical' issues, "The Big Questions".
He was asked to debate "a question this week about belief and evidence".
Nick, for those who don't know, is one of the UK's leading Holocaust revisionists or, for those who prefer the term, 'deniers'. He was sacked from his job at University College, London for producing this article. He is currently researching the Bletchley Park decryptions of the messages Germans were sending to themselves during WW2.
Nick said he would be happy to participate in the debate provided he was not the only individual representing his view. Having experienced BBC manipulation and their mission to misrepresent his research and make him look ridiculous before, he wanted some protection against the programme managers repeating the same dirty tactics.
After giving this response, he was told he would not be needed after all. The title of the debate had been changed.
The BBC realised that it had made an error in using the word "evidence" in the title of the debate.
The show was aired this morning. The middle debate (starts after about 20 minutes) is entitled:
IS FAITH COMPATIBLE WITH REASON?
So it's a case of, 'let's have none of this talk of "evidence", thank you very much'.
Nonetheless, in his introduction to the show, presenter Nicky Campbell said something very like:
"Is it the case that people believe what they want to believe in spite of the evidence. David Irving, for instance, speaks up for Hitler and denies the Holocaust despite the mountains of evidence stacked up against him."
NOT SO, NICKY. IRVING DENIES THE EXISTENCE OF HUMAN GAS CHAMBERS BECAUSE OF THE EVIDENCE AGAINST THEIR EXISTENCE, NOT IN SPITE OF SUCH EVIDENCE WHICH, IN REALITY, DOES NOT EXIST.
There you are Nick K., the BBC found a way of abusing Holocaust Deniers (with no possibility of reply) in spite of the fact they chickened out of having a genuine debate on the subject.
The programme will be 'up' here later today.
It is an example of the usual Talmudic paradigm used for the dissemination of serious and complex spiritual/ethical issues.i.e. two groups of combatants vying for 10 seconds in which to deliver a single coherent thought (with one side noisily rubbishing the very idea of God or anything universally meaningful outside of ourselves). The main 'faith' protagonist on this show was a 'past lives channeller'.
WE SHALL DESTROY GOD
Exposure of scientific evidence related to 'human gas chambers' will not be allowed, unless perhaps this evidence becomes more widely disseminated and believed amongst the general public. At this point we can expect a one-sided 'conspiracy-theory-debunked-style' documentary of the 9/11 and 7/7 variety will be carefully constructed and aired.
Christ said "THE TRUTH SHALL MAKE YOU FREE"
But the BBC is the very last place people should turn to to find it.
The corporate media, led by the BBC, is a corporate/banking controlled monster whose very purpose is to lead us not towards TRUTH and FREEDOM but towards LIES and ENSLAVEMENT.
This should be increasingly obvious to anyone with eyes to see.
.
Reaction...
2 hours ago
As far as I'm aware, David Irving merely observed that no one was gassed at Auschwitz. He made no general statements about the 'holocaust' at all.
ReplyDeleteDavid Irving is a professional historian of the second world war who almost uniquely has based his version of history on contemporary primary documents and interviews with eye witnesses. Before the Jewish concerted campaign against Irving and bookshops selling his books, Irving was acknowledged as an extremely good historian, possibly too good for some people's comfort.
Either the 'holocaust' was considered too trivial to mention or Churchill, Eisenhower, or de Gaulle had no evidence of it when publishing their WWII memoirs.
I just don't know if BBC acronym stand for British Buggering Children or is it British Bullsh*t Corporation?
ReplyDeleteCould be both as per BBC quantum mechanic
gave up tv dont know why i still pay to bbc
ReplyDeletesimple as, dont pay them. like vampires they can only get into your house if your daft enough to invite them. Other than that what can they do? if they can see your telly from outside tell them its just a weird ornament.
ReplyDeleteIve never paid mine for over a decade, they knock, they huff and they puff but they still have'nt had a single penny from me.
Wouldn't worry too much about the BBC anyway. Most individuals capable and willing to research topics have no interest in what they feed to the masses. The Swine Flu debacle in 2009 was the final straw for me and it became obvious they were debate stifling and agenda driven. Old Fergus Walsh and his flu jab push, so contrived with pseudo-experts on the website trawling through anything resembling authorative "proof" to win over the argument.Tried to put across a counterpunch not with the "agenda" and it didn't get through the moderator. Wish we could find a way to avoid paying the licence.
ReplyDeleteMillions of people believe most of what the BBC tells them ..... most especially the BIG lies.
DeleteIn the 60's anti-whites forced ALL and ONLY white countries to open their borders to non-white immigrants. Then anti-whites forced ALL and ONLY white people to "integrate" or face consequences for being "naziswhowantokill6millionjews." Now anti-whites are counting down the days until ALL and ONLY white children become minorities and eventually extinct EVERYWHERE. It's Genocide. "Anti-racist" is a codeword for anti-white.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=65254
ReplyDeleteA very good article from Paul Eisen - explaining the "holocaust - or rather, the holohoax.