Wednesday, 31 October 2012

Interview With the Expelled Bishop Williamson







This interview took place during the summer of 2010 while Bishop Williamson was under aqn 'order of silence' imposed by the head of his order, the SSPX, Bishop Fellay.

In October 2012 Fellay expelled Williamson from the SSPX so the interview can now be released.

Bishop Williamson's expulsion has created a crisis among the priests of the SSPX. Now that Fellay has expelled the SSPX's most determined and vociferous defender of its founding principles, it is clear that these principles have been abandoned for the comfort of being embraced by the mainstream Judaised Catholic Church.

That Fellay should expect his priests and congregation to go along with this is surprising. We shall see how the situation plays out. One wonders what the point of the SSPX is if it now submits to the reviled edicts of Vatican II. 

Can SSPX priests work happily alongside a Vatican hierarchy whose past leaders have participated in joint religious celebrations with those whose 'Holy Book', The Talmud states that "Christ is in hell drowning in boiling excrement". Can they make common cause with 'Catholics' who pal up with Rabbis who teach that all non-Jews are not human. That they are 'Goyim' or 'cattle'. 

Is not the consequence of the Vatican's ongoing completely one-sided truce plain for all to see? I recommend Piers Compton's "The Broken Cross" to those who would like to understand how it all happened.

Christianity is dying and is being helped to die whilst Jews, having gained a monopoly on victimhood, now control (with the assistance of their masonic and other assorted gentile helpers) just about every aspect of western societies from finance to food to communications to publications and the arts. Members of a community that constitute 0.5% of the UK population dominate every aspect of our lives and people dare not say so because our very human empathy has been weaponised towards our own spiritual and material destruction.

What fools we are.

What fools are so-called Christian leaders who attack those who state the obvious in defense of what were and remain, let us remember, the teachings of Christ.

But in these dark days, when official Christianity and Christ are in clearest opposition, who inside the Christian churches cares?

See also these two penetrating articles by Michael Hoffman on the expulsion of BW and the Zionist agent appointed by Bishop Fellay to defend BW.


Bishop Williamson Interview by Nick Kollerstrom  (Part One)




Part Two



Part Three



Part Four



Part Five



Part Six



Part Seven



Part Eight




.
.

11 comments:

  1. This is a very valuable interview. It clarifies a great deal. As a Buddhist with a Catholic upbringing I do not entirely agree with Bishop Williamson, but his analysis of the current situation of the world is very accurate. I believe Christianity presents an intermediate position. But not ultimate Truth. It is designed for souls on their Way to the Ultimate but still some distance from it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The 'ultimate' Truth is Yashua Anointed (The Lord Jesus Christ) and He is not a 'position', He is The Truth and He is The Word - end of. Anything else, including Buddhism and Roman Catholicism, is religion.

      Having said that, if Williamson is for real then I admire his stand for The Truth over the Holohoax.

      Delete
  2. "I believe Christianity presents an intermediate position."

    That's a sweeping statement, many Christians self identify with Christs message and take no heed of organised religions as they by the definition of the Commandments are Idolatrous.

    Which goes for Buddhism too, but not the story of Buddha.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Greetings Kevin,
    You know, we might not even be having this discussion were it not for Ernst Zundel. Although Zundel was found NOT guilty of propagating "hate" at the end of the first and now infamous Zundel trial in Toronto. (did six-million really die? was his only "crime") Despite that, "they" had it in for him. Bogus charges allegedly pertaining to a missed immigration hearing eventually lead to his deportation from the USA. After spending 2 years of solitary in a Canadian prison, at 111 Disco Rd. no less, he was subsequently deported to Germany where he spent another 5 years in prison. In light of this, Bishop Williamson has got off easy.
    Had Zundel been left alone and revisionist literature allowed to flourish, the world be a somewhat better place. Scan the history and WWII sections of prominent bookstore chains, you get the idea. Scan the rest of the book store and one will see that any and all manner of dichotomy is given free reign. There's a "christian" section, a "judaic studies" section, an atheist smorgasbord, a new age and tarot cards section, a gay section, a feminist section, liberal arts, queer arts, and victim arts abound. But you're not going to find a scrap of revisionist literature. I wonder why....(grin) Why the hate? why the fear? As Zundels's attorney Douglas Christie said, "the courtroom is no place for opinions on history."

    ReplyDelete
  4. And despite Bishop Williamson and I being polar in our world view, I like the man. Due to that polarity though, I approach his holocaust denial with some trepidation. You of course realize that alot people regard the Vatican, Pious XII in particular, as being complicit in the "whole affair." Which makes Willamson's proclamations all the more admirable, and somewhat natural. Yet, has he faced the full-on verbal assaults that are directed towards those who can't provide an alternative narrative to the official story? Doubts will not suffice. That one doubts that the Nazi's could kill approximately 3,000 Jews a day, every day, for the entire duration of the war to substantiate 6,ooo,ooo dead will not suffice. General texts on the holocaust will casually mention that in Auschwitz alone, up to 12,000 perished every day at one point (with no technical data provided). 12,000 gassed and cremated in 24 hrs? With an impossible 24 hr cycling of the ovens, that amounts to 500 per hour.
    I've asked this question here before. What are Jewish groups? Jewish groups who can control the fate of an American president.
    "It's 1948, the "Palestinian issue" as it was known at the State Dept. had been long festering. Survivors of the Holocaust were pouring into their biblical homeland and demanding the creation of an independent Zionist state. For reasons both political and humanitarian, Truman wanted to help create a new state of Israel. He was, as well, under tremendous pressure from Jewish groups, whose support he badly needed to stay in the White House."
    Walter Issacson & Evan Thomas - The Wise Men - Six Friends and the World they Made

    Gee, I wonder if this power has been augmented or diminshed? O'ROMNEY 2012!! That local Jewish groups get outraged over potential changes to circumcision laws is one thing, controlling the fate of such a noble figure like that the President of The United States of America (allied herself with the most murderous ideology in history & they still think they're going to escape what's coming!) is another.

    Consider Raul Hilberg...

    Throughout their long period of exile, 'the Jews had always been a minority, always in danger, but had learned that they could avert or survive destruction by placating and appeasing their enemies.'
    Hilberg, The Destruction of the European Jews

    So, we can just forget about these nebulous "Jewish Groups" that can decide the fate of the POTUS to get their sliver of dirt. Right....?
    Yet, aside from lies, threats, and blackmail - just what kind of "tremendous pressure" was applied to a humanitarian like Truman? Fulfilling a Masonic oath to some "brothers" in need? Were the holocaust legit, and these "Jewish groups" provided ample evidence of it to a good Christian brother like Truman, what possible need for "pressure". It would be the "Christian" thing to do, would it not? Alas, that was 1948.

    "Hilberg has recently reminded audiences of the lonely task that research on the Holocaust was when he first began in 1948. Professional writers and academic historians were virtually ignoring the subject, Philip Friedman lamented at the time, and few if any scholars were known to be working on it. For about a decade and a half after the end of the Second World War there was scant popular interest in the matter..."
    M. Marrus, The Holocaust in History

    The story of a lonely semitic boy, born to chosen parents of a chosen race has been a central motif for over 2,000 years. He's about to be replaced with another 6,000,000 semites as they consolidate the next 2,000 yrs.

    ReplyDelete
  5. And despite Bishop Williamson and I being polar in our world view, I like the man. Due to that polarity though, I approach his holocaust denial with some trepidation. You of course realize that alot people regard the Vatican, Pious XII in particular, as being complicit in the "whole affair." Which makes Willamson's proclamations all the more admirable, and somewhat natural. Yet, has he faced the full-on verbal assaults that are directed towards those who can't provide an alternative narrative to the official story? Doubts will not suffice. That one doubts that the Nazi's could kill approximately 3,000 Jews a day, every day, for the entire duration of the war to substantiate 6,ooo,ooo dead will not suffice. General texts on the holocaust will casually mention that in Auschwitz alone, up to 12,000 perished every day at one point (with no technical data provided). 12,000 gassed and cremated in 24 hrs? With an impossible 24 hr cycling of the ovens, that amounts to 500 per hour.
    I've asked this question here before. What are Jewish groups? Jewish groups who can control the fate of an American president.
    "It's 1948, the "Palestinian issue" as it was known at the State Dept. had been long festering. Survivors of the Holocaust were pouring into their biblical homeland and demanding the creation of an independent Zionist state. For reasons both political and humanitarian, Truman wanted to help create a new state of Israel. He was, as well, under tremendous pressure from Jewish groups, whose support he badly needed to stay in the White House."
    Walter Issacson & Evan Thomas - The Wise Men - Six Friends and the World they Made

    Gee, I wonder if this power has been augmented or diminshed? O'ROMNEY 2012!! That local Jewish groups get outraged over potential changes to circumcision laws is one thing, controlling the fate of such a noble figure like that the President of The United States of America (allied herself with the most murderous ideology in history & they still think they're going to escape what's coming!) is another.

    Consider Raul Hilberg...

    Throughout their long period of exile, 'the Jews had always been a minority, always in danger, but had learned that they could avert or survive destruction by placating and appeasing their enemies.'
    Hilberg, The Destruction of the European Jews

    So, we can just forget about these nebulous "Jewish Groups" that can decide the fate of the POTUS to get their sliver of dirt. Right....?
    Yet, aside from lies, threats, and blackmail - just what kind of "tremendous pressure" was applied to a humanitarian like Truman? Fulfilling a Masonic oath to some "brothers" in need? Were the holocaust legit, and these "Jewish groups" provided ample evidence of it to a good Christian brother like Truman, what possible need for "pressure". It would be the "Christian" thing to do, would it not? Alas, that was 1948.

    "Hilberg has recently reminded audiences of the lonely task that research on the Holocaust was when he first began in 1948. Professional writers and academic historians were virtually ignoring the subject, Philip Friedman lamented at the time, and few if any scholars were known to be working on it. For about a decade and a half after the end of the Second World War there was scant popular interest in the matter..."
    M. Marrus, The Holocaust in History

    The story of a lonely semitic boy, born to chosen parents of a chosen race has been a central motif for over 2,000 years. He's about to be replaced with another 6,000,000 semites as they consolidate the next 2,000 yrs.

    ReplyDelete
  6. "Yet, aside from lies, threats, and blackmail - just what kind of "tremendous pressure" was applied to a humanitarian like Truman?"

    Was it anything to do with Truman? Palestine was under British control in 1948, they having kicked the Turks out in 1917, and it was British troops that died at the hands of Jew terrorists. These same terrorists have ruled Palestine ever since.

    The Rothschilds blackmailed the British Government before WW2 in order for the unlawful state of Israel to be set up. They deliberately started WW2, because WW1 had failed in achieving all their aims which included the spread of Jewish Bolshevism across Europe.

    Hitler, too, was also sending many Jews from Germany to Palestine right up to 1939.

    ReplyDelete
  7. What I find amazing is his blind loyalty to an organisation, and in particular his 'superiors', that has more or less chucked him out. His main problem is his delusion in thinking that Rome is the church.

    ReplyDelete
  8. The Bishop believes that Christ placed Peter at the head of his church and that the pope eternally fills that role. He thinks the Church is occupied at the moment but that it will change.

    ReplyDelete
  9. "The Bishop believes that Christ placed Peter at the head of his church"

    And this is plainly not true if you read Matthew 16.

    http://ezinearticles.com/?Was-Peter-the-First-Pope?&id=257341

    Peter was never a bishop of Rome, which is what Rome also claims, and he only visited Rome twice; the second time to die, so even if a bishop he was never in Rome long enough to fulfil that role.

    The church at Rome was Paul's domain and he wasn't a bishop either. Both he and Peter were apostles (messengers) not bishops. Peter never encroached on Paul's territory (the Gentiles) and likewise Paul never encroached on Peter's (The Ten Tribes).

    Peter's mission was to the Lost Ten Tribes of Israel - the Northern Kingdom of Israel.

    Matt 10:5-6 (KJV) These twelve Jesus sent forth, and commanded them, saying, Go not into the way of the Gentiles, and into any city of the Samaritans enter ye not: 6 But go rather to the lost sheep of the house of Israel.

    To the House of Israel rather than the House of Judah (The Judahites and Jews). The Israelites were spread all over, from the lands of the Medes and Parthians (Modern Iran) in the east, to the British Isles in the west.

    The earliest church to planted was in Britain in 37 AD. Cardinal Baronius even admitted that The Church was in Britain long before Augustine and Patrick the slave trader arrived circa 600 AD.

    Joseph of Aremathea (Mary's uncle) came to Cornwall as tin merchant and brought The Lord here as a young man.

    William Blake wrote "And did those feet in ancient times?" etc. etc. Yes is the answer.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Drama_of_the_Lost_Disciples

    http://arian-catholic.org/arian/firstchurchinbritain.html


    ReplyDelete
  10. Gen/Ike wrote tens of thousands of words about
    WWII,NOT (1) ONE word about German death camps
    or "ovens".
    Winnie Churchhill wrote MORE volumes not one word about "BAD" German death camps these pepole would have loved to smear the Germans if
    there was something to pin on them.
    They knew that the people died in these camps because the US bombed the supply's (food,meds) that could have kept the people alive.
    Ike refused to allow food into Holland the last winter only supplies by Canada saved wholesale death in Amsterdam,I talked to real people who lived through that winter! -NO BS- check the facts yourselves.

    ReplyDelete